Where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted

Surat Singh Rathi Vs Shiv Kumar & Anr. (NCDRC Delhi) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) observed that where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdiction. Facts: In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails the order dated 26.10.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula ...