Decisions Based on AI-Hallucinated Precedents Unsustainable: SC

A decision of a Court or an adjudicating authority based on material which is fake and hallucinated is no decision at all, and it amounts to subversion of the rule of law | Zero tolerance for the Bar as well as the Bench to cite, refer to, or rely on AI-generated precedents without verification | Bar Council must take up this issue with utmost seriousness: SC The Supreme Court in Pooja Ramesh Singh Vs. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. and Anr. held that judicial decisions founded on fake, non-existent, or AI-generated hallucinated precedents are legally unsustainable and amount to a subversion of t...