The Registrar of Companies, Kolkata I, passed an adjudication order dated 07.07.2026 under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, imposing penalties for violation of Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 read with Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company had filed Form AOC-4 for FY 2022-23 with incorrect particulars, as the authorised share capital displayed on the MCA portal remained ₹90,00,000 while the paid-up share capital disclosed in the form was ₹1,98,38,380 following a merger. The company admitted the error, stating it resulted from the authorised share capital not being updated on the MCA portal, and sought to have the filing marked as defective. After issuing a show cause notice and considering the response, the Adjudicating Officer held that filing an incorrect statutory e-form attracted liability under Rule 8(3) and Section 450, and that seeking administrative rectification did not remove the completed contravention. A penalty of ₹10,000 each was imposed on Lifeline Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and its certifying director, Subhendu Maity, with directions to rectify the defect, pay the penalties within 90 days, and comply through the MCA e-Adjudication portal.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
ROC Kolkata I
4th Floor Plot No.IIIF/16, in AA-IIIF Rajarhat, New Town, Akandakeshari, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, 700135
Phone: 033-22877390
E-mail: roc.kolkata@mca.gov.in
Order ID: PO/ADJ/07-2026/WB/02498 Dated: 07/07/2026
ORDER FOR ADJUDICATION OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 454 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 (‘THE ACT’) FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 450 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.
A. Appointment of Adjudicating Officer:
Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette notification number S.O. 698(E) dated 10/02/2026 appointed undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred by section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 [herein after known as Act] read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act.
B. Company details:
In the matter relating to LIFELINE MARKETING PVT LTD [herein after known as Company] bearing CIN U51494WB1992PTC057290, is a company registered with this office under the Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013/1956 having its registered office situated at VICTORIA PLAZA, 5TH FLOOR 2A, SHAKESPEARE SARANI MIDDLETON ROW KOLKATA KOLKATA WEST BENGAL INDIA 700071
Individual details:
In the matter relating to SUBHENDU MAITY ——–
C. Provisions of the Act:
If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be 1[liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person]
D. Facts about the case:
1. Default committed by the officers in default/noticee –
Whereas as Rule 8(3) of Companies (The Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 states that: –
The authorized signatory and the professional, if any, who certify e-form shall be responsible for the correctness of the contents of e-form and correctness of the enclosures attached with the electronic form.
The Company has requested by filing Form No. GNL-1 vide SRN: AC3769495 along with Board resolution, request letter and Affidavit to mark defective the STP approved e-form AOC-4 F74997123 for the financial Year 2022-23. In the reason, the company stated, that it was subsequently observed that there had been an increase in the Authorised Share Capital pursuant to a merger, but the updated authorised share capital was not reflected on the MCA portal at the time of filing of e-Forms AOC -4.
That, consequently, in the above-mentioned e-forms AOC-4, the Authorised Share Capital continued to appear as Rs 90,00,000/, whereas the paid-up Share Capital disclosed in the same forms is Rs. 1,98,38,380/. Since paid-up Share Capital cannot exceed Authorised Share Capital, the filed e-Forms AOC-4 contains a technical discrepancy, which arose inadvertently due to non-updating of the Authorised Share Capital on the MCA records.
As per Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that: –
If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be 1[liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person].
2. E-Hearing not Requested
E. Order:
1. The Company filed form AOC-4 F74997123 (impugned e-form).
Upon examination / on the Company?s own admission, it is found that the impugned e-form was filed with incorrect particulars and/or incorrect/defective attachment(s), namely: that it was subsequently observed that there had been an increase in the Authorised Share Capital pursuant to a merger, but the updated authorised share capital was not reflected on the MCA portal at the time of filing of e-Forms AOC -4.
The Company has accepted the above defect/mistake and has requested that the impugned e-form be marked as defective and/or that it be treated as an incorrect filing, vide Form No. GNL-1 vide SRN AC3769495.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the company and certifying Director.
In response the noticee(s) admitted the defect/incorrect filing and stated that the incorrect filing was inadvertent and requested a lenient view.
The MCA electronic registry is a public record and statutory filings are relied upon by regulators, creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. Filing an e-form with incorrect contents and/or enclosures defeats the purpose of an electronic registry and directly triggers the responsibility fixed under Rule 8(3).
In the present case, the impugned e-form was filed with incorrect particulars/enclosures, which has been admitted by the Company. The Certifying Director is liable for contravention of Rule 8(3).
The request to mark the form as defective is an administrative rectification step and does not erase the completed contravention arising from filing an incorrect statutory e-form. Penalty liability under Rule 8(3) read with Section 450
therefore remains attracted.
In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, the undersigned hereby imposes penalty for violation of Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 read with Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, as under:
The Company/noticee(s) are further directed to rectify the defect by taking necessary steps on the MCA portal (including filing the correct/appropriate e-form and making necessary request(s) for marking the incorrect filing as defective, wherever such facility/process is prescribed), within prescribed time from the date of receipt of this order, and to intimate this office with proof of compliance.
2. The details of penalty imposed on the company, officers in default and others are shown in the table below:
| (A) | Name of person on whom penalty imposed (B) | Rectification of Default required
(C) |
Penalty Amount
(D) |
Additional Penalty (E) (*Per day of continuing default i.e. date of rectification of default less order issue date) | Maximum limit for Penalty (F) |
| 1 | LIFELINE MARKETING PVT LTD having CIN as U51494WB1992P TC057290 | 10000 | 0 | 200000 | |
| 2 | SUBHENDU MAITY having DIN as 00057610 | 10000 | 0 | 50000 |
3. The notified officers in default/noticee shall rectify the default mentioned above and pay the penalty, so applicable within 90 days of receipt of the order.
4. The notified officers in default/noticee shall pay the penalty amount via ‘e-Adjudication’ facility which can be accessed through the respective login IDs on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs and upload the copy of paid challan / SRN of e-filing (if applicable) on the ‘e-Adjudication’ portal itself. It is also directed that the penalty so imposed upon the officers in default shall be paid from their personal sources/income.
5. Appeal against this order may be filed in writing with the Regional Director, RD Kolkata within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ setting for the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order [Section 454 (5) & 454 (6) of the Act, read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014].
6. For penal consequences of non-payment of penalty within the prescribed time limit, please refer Section 454(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Arya Pyarelal,
Registrar of Companies
ROC Kolkata I
