(Government of India
Ministry Of Corporate Affairs
Office of the Registrar of Companies, Bihar-Cum-Official Liquidator, High Court, Patna
4th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Maurya Lok Complex
Dakbunglow Road, Patna-800001
No. ROC/PAT/SCN/143/33346/2539-2540 Dated:30.01.2023
Order for penalty for violation of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013
In the matter of
SINGHAM POLYTUBES PRIVATE LIMITED
CIN: U45100BR2017PTCO33346
Appointment of Adjudication Officer:‑
1. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette Notification No. A-42011/112/2014- Ad. II dated 24.03.2015 has appointed the undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred under section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after known as Act) read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act.
Company:-
2. As per the record of MCA Portal and AOC-4 filed by the company- Singham Polytubes Private Limited, CIN- U45100BR2017PTCO33346, (hereinafter referred to as the company) for the financial years ending on 31.03.2017, 31.03.2018, 31.03.2019, 31.03.2020 to 31.03.2021, Shri Pankaj Kumar (Membership no. 425878) is the Auditor of the company.
Facts about the case:-
3.1 As per Section 129(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 the Financial Statements shall give true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company, comply with the accounting standards notified under section 133 and be in form as provided in Schedule III.
For each class of equity share capital as per Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, the Company needs to disclose in the financial statements, the shares held by each shareholder holding more than five percent shares specifying the number of shares held.
However, the Company has not disclosed the same in its financial statements for the F.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 and has contravened the provisions of the Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, thereby affecting the true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company.
Thus, the auditor has failed to comment on the same in the audit report for the aforesaid financial years.
3.2 As per Section 129(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Financial Statements shall give true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company, comply with the accounting standards notified under section 133 and be in form as provided in Schedule III.
Upon observation of the filed financial statement for the financial year ended on 31.03.2017, 31.03.2018, 31.03.2019, 31.03.2020 and 31.03.2021, it is found that the Company has not disclosed the name of the related party and nature of the related party relationship where control exists irrespective whether there have been transactions between the related parties. According to AS -18 nature of related party shall be disclosed irrespective of any transaction and if there have been transactions between related parties, during the existence of a related party relationship, the reporting enterprise should disclose the following: the name of the transacting related party; (ii) a description of the relationship between the parties; (iii) a description of the nature of transactions; (iv) volume of the transactions either as an amount or as an appropriate proportion; (v) any other elements of the related party transactions necessary for an understanding of the financial statements; (vi) the amounts or appropriate proportions of outstanding items pertaining to related parties at the balance sheet date and provisions for doubtful debts due from such parties at that date; and (vii)amounts written off or written back in the period in respect of debts due from or to related parties.
Hence it is observed that the Company has contravened with the AS-18 read with Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013 thereby affecting the true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company from the financial year 2016-17 to 2020-21.
Thus, the auditor has failed to comment on the same in the audit report for the aforesaid financial years.
4. Whereas, this office has issued show cause notice for default under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 vide this office letter no. ROC/PAT/SCN/ sec.143/33346/ 2342 dated 23.12.2022.
5. However, this office has not received any reply from the abovesaid auditor. Hence, the provisions of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the auditors and therefore they are liable for penalty u/s. 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Financial Years 2016-2017 to 2020-2021.
Section 450 states that:- “If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Ad or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person”.
6. Further Section 446B states that “if penalty is payable for non-compliance of any of the provisions of this Act by a One Person Company, small company, start-up company or Producer Company, or by any of its officer in default, or any other person in respect of such company, then such company, its officer in default or any other person, as the case may be, shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be more than one-half of the penalty specified in such provisions subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person, as the case may be”.
7. As per clause 85 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, small company means a company whose paid up capital and turnover shall not exceed rupees four crore and rupees forty crore respectively. As per MCA portal, paid up capital of the company- Singham Polytubes Private Limited is Rs. 100,000/- and the turnover of the company is Rs. Nil as per Financial Years 2016-2017 to 2020 Therefore, the benefits of small company are extended to this noticee while adjudicating penalty.
ORDER
8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and after taking into account the provisions of Rule-11 of Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 (as amended), I hereby impose a penalty of Rs. 25,000 (Twenty-Five Thousand) on Shri Pankaj Kumar, Chartered Accountants- Membership no. 425878 as per Table Below for violation of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the financial years 2016-2017 to 2020-2021:
|
Nature of default |
Violation of Section of the Companies Act, 2013 |
Company/ Officers to whom penalty imposed | No. of days in default | Penalty for defaults (Rs.) as per Section 450 of the Act | Total Penalty (Rs.) | Penalty Imposed (Rs.) As per Sec. 446B of the Act |
| Non-reporting of violations/no n-compliance made by the company in audit report | Section 143 | On Shri Pankaj Kumar, Chartered Accountants- Membership no. 425878 | FY 2016-2017
to FY 2020-2021 |
Rs.10000 | Rs.10000*5 no. of years = Rs.50,000/‑ |
25,000 |
9. The noticee shall pay the amount of penalty individually by way of e-payment (available on Ministry website under “Pay miscellaneous fees” category in MCA fee and payment Services within 90 (ninety) days of this order. The Challan/SRN generated after payment of penalty through online mode shall be forwarded to this office.
10. Appeal against this order may be filled in writing with the Regional Director (ER), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kolkata, within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ (available on Ministry website mca.gov.in) setting forth the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order (Section 454(5) and 454(6) of the Act read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014).
11. Please note that if the noticee does not pay the penalty amount imposed herein within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, he shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months or with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both in terms of section 454(8)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013; apart from the liability to pay the penalty amount in compliance to this order, and for which prosecution will be filed without further notice in this regard.
(Aparajit Barua)
Adjudicating Officer &
Registrar of Companies-Cum‑
Official Liquidator, Patna
a private limited company was incorporated in the calendar year 2015. That private limited company has been non-functional since it’s date of incorporation; that is, that private limited company has not started any activity mentioned in the object clause of the Memorandum of Association.
Is the statutory auditor required to mention in his report that the private limited company being non-functional since it’s date of incorporation? is the statutory auditor liable for non- disclosure in his report
about the non-functional status of that private limited company?