Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Opinion article criticises the Ayodhya Bar resolution refusing to defend accused, citing constitutional protections, Bar Council r...
Corporate Law : Learn when a Board Meeting is mandatory and when a Circular Resolution can be used under the Companies Act, 2013. Explore the comp...
Corporate Law : Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2026 introduce key changes to FCRA compliance, including key functionaries, Sta...
Corporate Law : The article explains ghost assets, their financial and audit impact, CARO 2020 requirements, and the importance of periodic physic...
Corporate Law : Explains climate litigation, judicial doctrines, global trends, key arguments, critiques, and its role alongside legislation and g...
Corporate Law : EPFO's Amnesty Scheme 2026 offers retrospective PF Trust regularisation, specified compliance waivers and application window of si...
Corporate Law : DPIIT amends footwear QCOs by extending legacy stock clearance to 31 July 2027 and permitting annual import of 4,500 footwear samp...
Corporate Law : PIB issues a detailed FAQ on the Ethanol Blended Petrol Programme covering policy evolution, E20 rollout, vehicle compatibility, p...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines Indias E20 ethanol blending progress, programme milestones, industry views, and responses to frequently raised concer...
Corporate Law : NSE FAQs explain Regulation 42 Record Date filing, NEAPS submission, timelines, rights issue requirements and compliance under SEB...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chandigarh dismissed homebuyers’ plea, upheld the RP’s claim admission methodology, and declined re-computation of intere...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai rejected a Section 7 IBC plea, holding that the DRT review order only corrected errors and did not extend limitation....
Corporate Law : Kerala HC quashed a composite GST show cause notice covering 2019-20 to 2023-24 and allowed issuance of separate notices for each ...
Corporate Law : NCLT Delhi dismissed a perjury application, holding no exceptional case existed as the Section 9 petition was decided after consid...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Chennai dismissed the appeal, upholding leave under Section 33(5) IBC to challenge agreement termination before the Civil Co...
Corporate Law : IRDAI has revised financial result formats for listed insurers adopting Ind AS to meet SEBI LODR disclosure requirements, effectiv...
Corporate Law : IBBI extends the deadline for filing PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6 forms to 30 September 2026 and defers penalties while directing accurate e...
Corporate Law : PFRDA expands NPS investment options for CAB subscribers by adding two Auto Choice schemes through Circular No. PFRDA/2026/39 date...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspended an Insolvency Professional for three years over wrongful rejection of an admitted CIRP claim and non-compliance wit...
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
1. Deed of Modification in Partnership 2. Model Partnership Deed 3. Admitting New Partner 4. Retirement Deed 5. Dissolution of Partnership Involving Immovable Property 6. Admitting Minor 7. Modifying the Partnership Deed
DoPT’s O.M. No. 31011/4/2008-Estt.(A), dated 23rd September, 2008 Consequent upon the acceptance of the recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission, it has been decided to make necessary additions/changes in the CCS (LTC) Rules, 1988 as indicated below:-
Who will be covered by the Pension Scheme? Every member of the ceased Family Pension Scheme 1971 and anyone who joins any covered establishment on or after 16-11-95 is compulsorily to join this scheme, provided his/her salary/wage is less than Rs. 6500/- per month at the date of appointment.
Discover the latest MSME policy urging MSEs to include EM numbers on documents for better identification and compliance with income tax provisions.
Civil – Specific performance – Validity of – Stamp paper – Opinion of experts – Section 54 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 – Indian Stamp Rules, 1925 – Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Plaintiff-Appellant alleged that the First Defendant agreed to sell suit property by an agreement and received some amount as advance – Plaintiff issued a notice to execute the sale deed and receive the balance amount – Defendant denied the agreement and executed the sale deed in favour of Second Defendant – Plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance – Defendant contended that the sale agreement put forth by the Plaintiff was forged and concocted – Trial Court dismissed the suit on the ground that the sale put forth by Plaintiff was false –
It comes into force on the 12th October, 2005 (120th day of its enactment on 15th June, 2005). Some provisions have come into force with immediate effect viz. obligations of public authorities [S.4 (1)], designation of Public Information Officers and Assistant Public Information Officers[S.5( 1) and 5(2)], constitution of Central Information Commission (S.12 and 13), constitution of State Information Commission (S.15 and 16), non-applicability of the Act to Intelligence and Security Organizations (S.24) and power to make rules to carry out the provisions of the Act (S.27 and 28).
A mere allegation of corruption not backed by credible evidence would not be sufficient to direct the country’s intelligence organisations to reveal information under the RTI Act, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held.
JUST a week ago, we carried a story and case where a Single Bench of the Delhi High Court had taken serious note of the lackadaisical approach of the Department in releasing the information. The High Court had directed the department to furnish the information within two weeks.
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has held that citizens cannot question government policies and plans by utilising the Right to Information Act. The Commission noted this while dismissing an application filed by a Mumbai resident Amin Merchant who had sought information from Finance Ministry as to why certain tariff policy was framed by the Centre.
There is good news in store for SEZ units. The government is likely to put on hold its plan of placing an export obligation on units operating in SEZs. The commerce department has suggested to the finance ministry that the government should consider imposing an export obligation only if exports from such zones fall below a threshold limit in the coming years. While the government was deliberating making it compulsory for all SEZs to export 51% of what they produce, the present average export figures of SEZs is much higher at 82%.
