Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Learn about different types of income tax notices, letters, and orders issued by the Income Tax Department to individual taxpayers...
Income Tax : The Finance Act (No. 2), 2024, has brought a significant change by imposing a time limit on TDS correction statements. Until now, ...
Income Tax : Budget 2025 highlights income tax changes, revised tax slabs, TDS amendments, IFSC incentives, updated return filing limits, and d...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Bill 2025, set to replace the 1961 Act, redefines the role of Chartered Accountants in tax compliance and represent...
Income Tax : Explore the key takeaways of the New Income Tax Bill 2025, including structural changes, simplified provisions, and updates in tax...
Income Tax : Lok Sabha issues corrigenda for the Income-tax Bill, 2025, correcting references, formatting, and legal citations. Read the key am...
Income Tax : KSCAA's representation to CBDT highlights challenges in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, focusing on delayed appeals and suggesti...
Income Tax : Join our webinar on Faceless Tax Assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn concepts, challenges, and solutions from expert...
Income Tax : Income-Tax Bill 2025 simplifies tax laws by reducing sections, chapters, and words while ensuring no policy or tax rate changes. K...
Income Tax : Explore the section mapping of the New Income-Tax Bill 2025, comparing provisions with the Income-Tax Act, 1961. See key changes, ...
Income Tax : DCIT Vs Triton Hotels and Resorts Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, adjudicated appeals ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune rules that an ITI substantially funded by the government qualifies for tax exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab), even ...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot remanded the matter as lower authority has not exercised their power to enquiry in section 131 and 133(6) of the Act t...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore upholds CIT(A)'s decision, stating that belated filing of Form 10 is a procedural lapse and doesn't disqualify an i...
Income Tax : It is also noteworthy that the learned Departmental Representative (DR), during the hearing, did not point out any material differ...
Income Tax : The Central Government notifies Punjab RERA for tax exemption under Section 10(46A) of the Income-tax Act, effective from the 2024...
Income Tax : The Indian government is set to introduce the new Income Tax Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on February 13, 2025. This comprehensive...
Income Tax : Bhaikaka University, Gujarat, is approved for scientific research under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, effective f...
Income Tax : Notification No. 14/2025 updates Form 49C submission rules for liaison offices under the Income-Tax Act. Filing deadline set to 8 ...
Income Tax : CBDT amends Income-Tax Rules, 1962, updating regulations for Infrastructure Debt Funds, including investment criteria, bond issuan...
Notification No. 43/2011 – Income Tax [F. NO. 187/01-2011-ITA.I], DATED 19-8-2011 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), Central Board of Direct Taxes, number S.O. 732(E), dated the 3rd July, 2001, namely:-
Notification No. 42/2011 – Income Tax- Section 120(1) and (2) Of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 – Income-Tax Authorities – Jurisdiction of Director General/Director (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) – Supersession of Notification Nos. S.O. 883(E), Dated 14-9-2001; S.O. 494(E), Dated 13-3-2008; S.O. 855(E) and S.O. 856(E), Both Dated 31-5-2007.
Notification No.41/2011 – Income Tax [F.NO. 187/11 /2009-ITA.I], DATED 19-8-2011 – In the notification of Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes), number 62/2010, dated 27-7-2010 bearing S.O. 1843(E) and published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated 27th July, 2010, in the Schedule for Serial number 112 at column No. 6(b)
Society For The Small & Medium Exporters Vs DIT (ITAT Delhi)- In a case where the objects of the society may be charitable, but, in the absence of carrying on those activities despite the fact that the activities which were carried on were for the purpose of generating income, the society is not entitled for registration for that year. Therefore, it is held that for assessment year 2008-09 and for subsequent years in which the assessee does not carry out charitable activity, the assessee has been rightly refused to get benefit of registration as charitable institution. The only activity which has been carried out is for the purpose of generating income, which is not a charitable activity in itself. Therefore, it is held that learned DIT (E) has rightly refused to grant registration to the assessee and his order is upheld.
As many as 926 computerised branches of public and private sector banks will receive advance income tax in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai. These arrangements have been made for the convenience of the Income Tax assesses. Of the 926 bank branches 862 branches are public sector bank branches, 35 HDFC bank branches, 10 ICICI bank branches and 19 AXIS bank branches. The Reserve Bank of India has advised income tax assesses to take advantage of these standing arrangements made for their convenience.
The government has been directed by the Central Administrative Tribunal to forthwith release the pension and other post-retirement benefits of a former I-T assistant commissioner, withheld on the alleged ground of a corruption case pending against him. The New Delhi-based principal bench of CAT ordered release of V B Bansal”s pension pointing out to the Centre that the CBI, which had lodged an FIR against him for owning assets exceeding his legal income, had subsequently moved the court seeking permission to cancel it.
During the past few days, I had extensive deliberations and meaningful discussions in the Board with my colleagues in the CBDT on the way forward. The mandate before us is for a substantive improvement in all areas of common concern coupled with use of technology and innovation to boost revenue resources and to take the department forward towards the realization of our Vision Statement. Our Revenue Collection target for the present fiscal stands at over Rs. 5.32 lakh crores which has been increased by 10% by the Hon’ble FM. I would like to call upon every member of the Aayakar Parivar to take on the call of duty and put in their best efforts for the attainment of the revised target. I know it is difficult, however nothing is impossible and I am confident that the officers will rise to the occasion.
ACIT Vs Bank Of India (ITAT Mumbai)- As per the provisions of section 115JAA(2), the amount of tax credit of MAT to be carried forward is determined and it is not provided therein that first the taxes paid are to be adjusted and then credit of MAT is to be given. In the case of Chemplast Sanmar, cited supra, the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal has held while deciding he issue u/s.234B and 234C that the tax credit u/s.115JA(2) is advance tax retained by the Department for being set off against the tax liability of future years. We are in agreement with the ld. CIT that the assessee is entitled for interest u/s.244A on the refund given to it. We are also of the view that it was a mistake which could be rectified u/s. 154. So from this is is clear that MAT credit has to be given right at the beginning and if ultimately the calculation leads to a refund, then such interest has to be paid u/s.244A.
ITO V/s. Tropicana Beverages Company (ITAT Delhi)- When it is established that the machinery on which depreciation has been claimed by the assessee, had been provided by the assessee to Dynamix for the purpose of manufacturing the product of the assessee, necessarily the machinery was used for the purpose of the business of the assessee. That being so, ‘used for the purposes of the business’ in section 32 of the Act is applicable to the assessee.
DCIT, Kolkata Vs Sushma Devi Agarwal (ITAT Kolkata)- Assessee has failed to establish that disclosure of additional income in the revised return by way of declaring G. P. rate at 15% as against 6.93% shown in return filed u/s. 153A of the Act was voluntary and in good faith to buy peace with the department. On the other hand, the assessee filed the revised return only after the concealment was detected by the AO and he confronted the assessee with the same. In such circumstances, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act of Ps.14,61,678/- for concealment of income has rightly been levied by the A.O.
