The Court ruled that issuing a common notice for different financial years violates established precedent, though fresh action may be taken in accordance with law.
The High Court held that delay beyond the maximum 120-day period under Section 107 of the GGST Act is uncondonable. Writ jurisdiction cannot override statutory limitation.
The Tribunal held that failure of the Assessing Officer to verify genuineness of a ₹30 lakh donation under Section 80GGC rendered the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, justifying revision under Section 263.
The Court held that failure to comply with payment conditions under the 2020 Scheme automatically revived withdrawn revision petitions. This made the assessee eligible under the 2024 DTVSV Scheme.
The Court held that an employee must be given access to documents relied upon for dismissal, including the Police Verification Report. It directed the department to furnish the report while keeping the merits of termination open.
The High Court granted anticipatory bail in a GST fraud case, noting that the allegations were primarily supported by documentary and digital evidence already seized. Custodial interrogation was found unnecessary.
The High Court upheld rejection of a tender bid due to non-submission of EMD, ruling that mere assembly of purchased components did not qualify as manufacturing. The petitioner was not entitled to MSME exemption.
The High Court quashed the rejection of a university’s Section 10(46) application because no opportunity of hearing was granted. It held that prior exemptions under other provisions do not bar independent consideration.
The High Court dismissed Revenue appeals for AY 2006-07 to 2011-12, holding that its earlier decisions on treaty interpretation squarely applied. It ruled that the Tribunal correctly relied on binding precedents, leaving no ground for interference.
he High Court held that parallel adjudicatory proceedings under GST are barred when one authority has already initiated action on the same subject matter. It directed Central and State authorities to coordinate in line with Supreme Court guidelines to avoid duplication.
