The High Court directs the Tehsildar to take physical possession of secured assets under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act after prolonged delay, emphasizing the statutory time limits.
The High Court set aside a GST assessment order as the petitioner was not provided a personal hearing despite filing a reply. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
The Court ruled that reassessment proceedings initiated by a non-faceless officer violate the faceless regime. Both the Section 148 notice and the assessment order were quashed, subject to the Supreme Court’s final view on related precedents.
The Court held that the Tribunal erred by rejecting an adjournment request without assigning reasons. The matter was remanded for a fresh hearing after finding a violation of natural justice.
Allahabad HC rules that GST cannot be levied on work contracts executed under the VAT regime. Payments received later do not attract tax, penalty, or interest under GST.
The Court found that the petitioner did not receive effective notice because the SCN was placed in a less visible portal tab. It set aside the demand order and directed a fresh hearing opportunity.
The Court held that uploading the show-cause notice only under the additional tab did not constitute valid service. The order and appeal rejection were set aside, and the petitioner was granted a fresh opportunity to reply.
High Court declined to interfere with an ex parte GST order after assessee failed to attend scheduled hearings. Petitioner was directed to pursue statutory appeal, with outcome subject to Supreme Court’s decision on related notifications.
Tribunal emphasizes requirement of notice under section 153C for assessments in block period, quashing AY 2021-22 assessment framed without jurisdiction.
The ITAT remitted the issue to the CIT(A), noting that exemption provisions were wrongly applied to a non-qualifying investor. The takeaway is that exemption claims in share premium cases must match statutory definitions and evidence.
