State Level Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering Vs Zeba Distributors (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) As there was no reduction in the rate of tax on the Eastern Meat Masala, hence the anti-profiteering provisions contained in Section 171(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are not attracted. There is also no increase in the per unit […]
Shri Shylesh Damodaran Vs Landmark Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is clear from the plain reading of Section 171 (1) that it deals with two situations one relating to the passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax and the second pertaining to the passing on the benefit of the […]
As the supply to a DFS by an Indian supplier is not to ‘a place outside India’, therefore, such supplies do not qualify as ‘export of goods’ under GST. Consequently, such supplies cannot be made without payment of duty by furnishing a bond/letter of undertaking (LUT) under rule 96-A of the CGST Rules, 2017.
A. FAQs on Engage/Disengage GST Practitioner Q.1 Can I engage GST Practitioner from a different state? Ans: Yes, you can engage GST Practitioner from a different state. However, when searching for inter-state GSTPs, search criteria will auto-fill the Taxpayer’s default state, district and pin code in respective fields. The Taxpayer will need to change those […]
A. FAQs on Search Taxpayers Opted In/Out of GST Composition Scheme Q.1 Can I find if my dealer/ supplier is under the Composition scheme or not? Ans: You can use GSTIN to search the details of a taxpayer who have opted in for the composition scheme or opted out from the composition scheme. Note: Only […]
Under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) notifies the rate of exchange for the purpose of conversion of foreign exchange to Indian Rupees and vice versa for assessment of imports & exports.
Since the complainant is also a party to the said proceeding , he can not separately agitate this complaint before the MahaRERA, as it will amount to agitate multiple proceedings on the same issue, which is not permissible in RERA Act, 2016. In the present case since the MahaRERA has already given judgment in the proceeding filed by the complainant through the Rising City Ghatkopar Association, the same issue can not be agitated before the MahaRERA again.
1. This Act may be called the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2018. 2. In section 16 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002,—
1. (1) This Act may be called the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018. (2) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the 24th October 2018.
In re Nagrani Warehouseing Private Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Determining the classification of P.P. Bags which are made from strips having width of less than 5mm. It is to be decided by the Hon’ble Advance ruling authority as to whether the aforesaid PP bags would classify under chapter heading 63 or chapter 39 of […]
