In the case of JCIT v. Rahul Rajnikant Parikh, ITAT Mumbai held that interest income need not be assessed when assessee is a Non-resident.
CBIC notifies Customs Exchange rate for Import & Export wef 16th December, 2022 vide Exchange rate vide Notification No. 109/2022 – Customs (N.T.) | dated 15th December, 2022. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NEW DELHI ***** Notification No. 109/2022 – Customs (N.T.) | dated 15th […]
Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver vide Notification No. 108/2022-Customs (N.T.) | Dated: 15th December, 2022 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) New Delhi Notification No. 108/2022-Customs (N.T.) | Dated: 15th December, 2022 S.O. 5869(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by […]
Pursuant to discussions with the Stock Exchanges, with a view to ensure uniformity in the reporting of monthly developments and activities at the Stock Exchanges, the formats of the MDR and MAR have been revised and copies of the same are enclosed as Annexure A and Annexure B, respectively.
1. (1) This order may be called the Refrigerating Appliances (Quality Control) Amendment Order, 2022. (2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.
In an event of demise of an individual belonging to Promoter or Promoter Group where the shares held by such individual are not transmitted to the legal heir as on the end of the quarter, the company should disclose detailed notes for the same in the shareholding pattern.
ITAT find that if the expenses are proved to be un-genuine on verification, the AO ought to have disallowed the entire expenditure. Accepting 75% of expenditure as allowable and the remaining 25% disallowable on ad-hoc basis cannot be considered as a reasonably rational order.
Velankanni Constructions Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee being resident firm is stated to be engaged in civil construction. The assessee could not produce bills or voucher for blue metal jelly purchase, brick purchase and sand purchase. The reasons adduced were that the assessee undertook work at remote places and was dependent on local supplies. […]
TDK India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) Regarding Works Contract Service, it has been observed in the impugned order that w.e.f 01.07.2012, vide Notification No. 30/2012-ST, the reverse charge mechanism for Works Contract Service was introduced. I find that this Notification is applicable to individual/partnership firm and Hindu Undivided Family […]
ACIT (Intl. Taxn) Vs Allscripts (India) Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is pertinent to note that Section 201(3) specifies the time limit in respect of TDS for residents only. The CIT(A) observed that the order dated 25.03.2019 is beyond four years in light of Hon’ble Delhi High Court decision in case of NHK Japan Broadcasting […]
