Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Tarun Sales (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Tarun Sales (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that Since no dealer or sub-dealer was appointed either by BSNL or by the assessee, for the purpose of marketing the products and/or service of the BSNL, the entire sales were to customers, either directly or through shopkeepers, who rendered services to the customers. The entire sales were in cash. No commission was paid by the assessee to the customers. Then, section 194H of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not cover such discounts as under consideration herein and that being so, obviously section 40(a)(ia) was wrongly applied. It was only discounts offered...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930