This appeal is preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 18.09.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in S.A. No. 780 of 2006 whereby learned single Judge of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein at the admission stage.
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s Grasim Industries Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) It was held that measure of the levy contemplated in Section 4 of the Act will not be controlled by the nature of the levy. So long a reasonable nexus is discernible between the measure and the nature of the levy both […]
Import of Fresh Ginger wholly produced in Nepal, classified under Exim Code 0910 11 10, is ‘Free’ subject to Article IV & V of Indo-Nepal Treaty of Trade.
Restriction on import of Peas classified under Exim Code 0713 10 00 (including Yellow peas, Green peas, Dun peas and Kaspa peas) is extended for a further period of three months, i.e., till 30.09.2018.
Mahabir Industries Vs. PCIT (Supreme High Court) The assessee in the instant case has not got deduction under Section 80-IC for a period of ten years as he started claiming deduction under this provision w.e.f. Assessment Year 2006-07. Situation Nos. (b) and (c) mentioned above would not apply to the assessee as it’s undertaking/enterprise is […]
In re Amaravathi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) 1. Whether M/s. Amaravathi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (AMRCL) is a Government authority as per the Notification No. 12/2017 of Central Tax ( Rate), dated 28th June 2017, read with Notification No. 32/2017 of Central Tax (Rate), dated 13th October 2017. The applicant / […]
Please refer to our Master Circular RBI/2017-18/1 dated July 1, 2017 on the above subject. We have now revised and updated the Master Circular which consolidates important instructions on the subject issued by the Reserve Bank of India till June 30, 2018
M/s. Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) We find that evidences which have been furnished by the assessee have not been discussed; and if the Director has not been found then it cannot be said that identity of the company is not established especially in wake of income tax records and share allotment […]
Aristo Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) It is not in dispute that the assessee had maintained separate books of accounts for trading activity and manufacturing activity. We find that the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80IE of the Act only in respect of profits derived from manufacturing activity only. It is not in dispute that […]
Macquarie Global Services Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Once the claim of deduction u/s 10AA has been accepted in the first year of the operations and also in the second year, then in the third year same cannot be withdrawn by examining the factors which were required to be seen in the first year of the […]
