Karan Bhalla Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The assessee has given the details of source of the cash which are reproduced in the order of the Ld. CIT(A).However no supporting documents have been filed. The assessee did not produce any independent evidence in support of cash flow statement. No evidence of any amount is received on […]
Standard Operating Procedure for Export of Onion as per para 1.05 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 considering Notification No. 21/2015-2020 dated 29.09.2019 issued by the DGFT whereby export of Onions has been prohibited with immediate effect.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) was introduced with an objective to consolidate and amend the laws relating to reorganisation of the insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals in a time-bound manner for maximisation of value of assets of such persons, to promote entrepreneurship, availability of credit
Liquidation has been defined as a process of bringing a business to an end and distribution of the assets of the company between persons having claims over the company. Liquidation is a consequence of being insolvent and / or having no realistic prospect of a going concern.
One of the objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code), as stated in its preamble, is to ‘balance the interests of all the stakeholders including alteration in the order of priority of payment of Government dues.’
As a step forward towards Ease of Doing Business initiative, MGSTD has now introduced facility to make payment of PTRC and PTEC in single screen through its web-site. This facility is optional.
Where assessee failed to show that delay in filing the appeal was not attributable to any factors which were beyond its control, plea raised by assessee for condoning the delay in filing appeal was dismissed.
Court concurs with the CIT(A) and the ITAT that once the finding of the AO on bogus purchases was set aside, it could not be said that there was any concealment of facts or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the Assessee that warranted the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.
In re Jotun India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether recovery of 50% of Parental Health Insurance Premium from employees amounts to ‘supply of service’ under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? AAAR has ruled that. they are not rendering any service of health insurance to their employees and hence, […]
Whether the contract entered into with DMRC for supply, erection, installation, commissioning and testing of UPS system qualifies as a supply of works contract under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act?