Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sri Anil J Kothari (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Sri Anil J Kothari (ITAT Ahmedabad)

AO has made addition on account of unverifiable purchases at Rs.2,70,40,363/- being entire purchases which were reduced to 0.25% of total disputed purchases. Thus, the addition was estimated @ 0.25% of transaction amount, which cannot therefore, be termed as conclusive proof of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The finding recorded in assessment order is not conclusive for imposition of penalty but it has only persuasive value. Therefore, the pro

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31