Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, hereby designates the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate in each Sessions Division in the States of Punjab and Haryana and the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate in the Union Territory of Chandigarh
(1) This Order may be called the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020. (2) It shall apply to every company including a foreign company as defined in clause (42) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) [hereinafter referred to as the Companies Act], except–
Notification No. 17/2020-Csutoms (N.T.) in respect of Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) Notification No. 17/2020-CUSTOMS (N.T.) New Delhi, 25th February, 2020 6 Phalguna, 1941 (SAKA) S.O. 855(E).:- In […]
Where assessee was under a bona fide belief about allowability of certain provisions and there was no suppression of facts or deliberate concealment on assessee’s part, mere disallowance by AO due to difference of opinion could not lead to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c).
It appears that petitioner Satnarain had rendered his professional services and assistance for the purpose of incorporation of the firms. At this stage, it cannot be said that he had joined hands with Rajesh Mittal or was beneficiary of any amount other than his professinal fee.
Public comments are therefore hereby solicited on the draft Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2020. Copy of the CLRC Report, Competition Act, 2002 as well as Draft Competition (Amendment) Bill may be accessed at the web link mentioned below and comments, if any, may be submitted online therein by end of business hours on 06th March, 2020 positively.
1. These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020. 2. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
High Court of Judicature at Madras has held that the refund of input Cenvat credit cannot be denied just because premises was unregistered, in the case of Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai Vs. BNP Paribas Sundaram Global Securities, in CMA No. 57 of 2018 dated 18.01.2018. Therefore, the denial of refund for the reasons of a premises being unregistered cannot sustain and the same is set aside.
The application to withdraw from the Composition levy is required to be filed within 7 days from the date when taxpayer fails to satisfy any condition of Section 10 of CGST/ SGST Act or rules made thereunder or a taxpayer may also voluntarily opt out of the Composition levy by filing an application.
In addition to filing the application to opt for Composition Levy, the Migrated taxpayers are also required to file a form for Stock Intimation to furnish the details of stock including inward supply of goods from unregistered persons, held by them on the day preceding the date from which they opt to pay the composition levy.
