Notifications No. 15/2021-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI)/S.O. 620(E), Dated: 09.02.2021. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 9th February, 2021 Notifications No. 15/2021-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) S.O. 620(E).—In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 453(E), dated 4th June 2015 in Gazette of […]
We direct that until decision is taken on the objection filed by the petitioners by respondent No.2, petitioner No.1 shall maintain a balance of Rs. 5,00,000.00 in the escrow account out of the share belonging to the petitioner No.1. In effect, we lift the provisional attachment in so far as petitioner No. 1’s share in the escrow account is concerned subject to maintaining credit balance of Rs. 5,00,000.00 by petitioner No. 1 out of its share and direct that respondent No.4 would be at liberty to transfer / remit the proportionate amount due to petitioner No. 1 to the account of petitioner No.1 and maintain balance of Rs. 5,00,000.00 till the aforementioned decision is taken.
This is one more matter wherein serious allegations of harassment, coercion, threats, etc. have been alleged against the respondents Nos.4 and 5 respectively herein. It appears that the search was undertaken under Section 67 of the Act at the premises of the writ applicant, and in the course of the search, the respondents Nos.4 and 5 are alleged to have caused undue harassment to the writ applicant. It is alleged that the writ applicant was forced and threatened to transfer an amount of Rs.2.68 Crore by way of the DRC – 03.
CIRCULAR SEBI/HO/ISD/ISD/CIR/P/2021/19 February 09, 2021 To All Recognized Stock Exchanges Dear Sir/Madam, Sub: Revised disclosure formats under Regulation 7 of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 1. SEBI, vide Circular nos. CIR/ISD/01/2015 dated May 11, 2015 and CIR/ISD/02/2015 dated September 16, 2015, had specified the formats for disclosures under Regulation 7 of SEBI (Prohibition […]
When the appeal was taken up learned Counsel for the appellant submitted the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below ₹ one crore. He prayed for withdrawal of the present appeal.
In re Spraymet Surface Technologies (Pvt.) Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) Section 2 (68) of CGST Act, 2017 defines job work as, ‘any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person’. Further Schedule II, in relation to Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017, prescribes the activities or transactions to […]
Secretary, DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Dr. Guruprasad Mohapatratoday said that increase in FDI limit from 49% to 74% in Insurance Companies announced in the Union Budget 2021-22 will have positive impact on the Indian economy.
Where the petitioner instead of submitting TRAN-1 form for claiming ITC submitted GSTR-3B. The court held that the petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit of claiming the credit lying in its account on the stipulated date only on the basis of procedural or technical wrangles that one form TRAN-1 was not filled by the petitioner particularly when the petitioner has reflected the said credit in its return GSTR-3B.
Press Release by CGST Delhi South Commissionerate regarding arrest of a Director of a company under CGST Act, 2017 for non deposit of Rs. 24.96 crores of GST collected but not paid OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICE TAX, DELHI SOUTH COMMISSIONERATE, 3rd FLOOR, EIL ANNEXEE BUILDING, BIKAJI KAMA PLACE, NEW […]
Budget 2021-22 has proposed various measures to reduce regulatory compliance burden which will improve ease of doing business for industry and ease of living for citizens.
