Karnataka High Court upholds condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) in IMA scam recovery case, clarifies respondent as successor/representative; relief sustained but ruling not a precedent.
Karnataka High Court quashes reassessment as Sec 148A(b) notice issued to deceased is void ab initio; all proceedings set aside, liberty granted to reopen against legal representatives.
Karnataka High Court sets aside ₹45 lakh Sec 69 addition, remands to ITAT to consider fresh evidence on property transaction and refund; holds explanation must be examined even at later stage.
The issue was whether exporters took reasonable steps to realise overseas payments. The Tribunal held that lack of documentary proof and recovery action justified penalties under FEMA.
The issue involved recall of orders passed after the respondent failed to attend hearings. The Tribunal ruled that continued absence despite ample chances showed negligence, and recall relief could not be granted.
Karnataka High Court flags catch-22 in TDS prosecution of ex-MD post-liquidation; directs Official Liquidator to act on representation, grants interim protection, remedy lies under Sec 260A.
Karnataka High Court quashes Sec 148A(d), Sec 148 notice and ex-parte assessment due to non-receipt of Sec 148A(b) notice; remands for fresh reply, keeps all issues open.
Karnataka High Court sets aside Sec 154 rectification, remands Sec 54 exemption claim for fresh review; validity of Sec 154 left open, assessee to appear before AO without notice.
The Tribunal ruled that surrender of tenancy rights occurs only upon receiving new property possession. As possession was given later, tax could not be levied in the current year. The decision ensures correct year of taxation.
The issue involved taxing capital gains from a development agreement in multiple years. The court held the same income cannot be taxed twice and set aside the addition subject to verification.
