Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Crystal Hatcheries Private Limited Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Crystal Hatcheries Private Limited Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) The Karnataka High Court dealt with an addition of ₹45 lakh made under Section 69 (unexplained investment) based on materials found during a search in a third party’s premises (developer). The assessee had earlier failed to satisfactorily explain the nature of the transaction before the authorities and the Tribunal, leading to confirmation of the addition. However, before the High Court, the assessee produced additional documents including sale deeds, ledger accounts, and confirmation of refund from the developer, to establi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930