Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CBDT Vs Competent Authority For M/s Ima and Others Scam Cases (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CBDT Vs Competent Authority For M/s Ima and Others Scam Cases (Karnataka High Court) The Karnataka High Court, in a review petition filed by the Department, partly modified its earlier order which had allowed condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) for filing belated returns by the Competent Authority handling recovery in a Ponzi scam case. The original order had taken a justice-oriented approach, holding that the delay (1444 days and 714 days) was due to genuine hardship, bona fide reasons and practical difficulties in quantifying recoveries, and had directed acceptance of returns. In re...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930