ITAT Mumbai held that bad debts arising from credit card business would be part and parcel of loss arising in the course of banking business and hence liable as deduction u/s.36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that loss on account of the Forward Contracts cannot be considered as speculative loss and hence loss on Forward Contracts is allowable as a deduction from the income chargeable to tax even if the Forward Contracts have not closed.
ITAT Kolkata held that company incorporated on 07.11.2012 and valuation of share done on 16.11.2012, therefore share premium on issue of equity share capital and issue of preference share capital are hit by provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act and hence addition towards share premium sustained.
Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the circular issued by District Central Cooperative Banks as the circular merely sought to bring to the notice of the petitioner societies the statutory provisions in regard to the deduction of tax, enjoining that they adhere to and comply with the same.
NCLAT Chennai held that the word Person, is defined as per Section 3 (23)(d) of the I & B Code, which includes a Trust, therefore, there is no Fetter / Embargo or a Legal Impediment, for a Trust, to be a Resolution Applicant, in submitting a Resolution Plan
ITAT Bangalore held that rental income is inseparably connected with the business carried on by the assessee and emanate directly from the business of the undertaking. Accordingly, rental income derived by the assessee from Cargo Agents, Airlines, Banks etc., is derived from the cargo business and eligible for deduction u/s. 80IA. The addition is deleted.
CESTAT Delhi held that as the goods are not being notified under section 123 of the Act, it is onus on the revenue to establish the smuggled nature of the goods. In absence of any evidence, allegation of smuggled nature unsustainable.
Gujarat High Court held that provisional attachment of property under section 83 of the CGST Act can be invoked only during pendency of certain proceedings. In absence of any initiation of proceedings, powers of provisional attachment cannot be exercised.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that undisclosed income declared during the course of search is treated as gross income as genuineness of expenditure claimed against the same is not doubted by AO.
ITAT Pune held that disallowance of 1% is reasonable as admittedly the share transactions were manipulated through entry provider stockbrokers in order to obtain fraudulent income by rigging share prices and selling them in order to justify the unaccounted income of the assessee.
