Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hyderabad Yadgiri Tollway Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hyderabad Yadgiri Tollway Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Forex Loss Claimed in One Go Invalid – AO’s Lapse Invites 263 Revision – ITAT Ahmedabad Upholds PCIT’s Action; ITAT Upholds 263: AO Failed to Enforce ICDS-VI on Foreign Exchange Loss; Exchange Loss Accounting: Claim Must Be Annual, Not Cumulative on Loan Repayment; PCIT Intervention Justified: AO’s Lack of Inquiry on Forex Loss Claim. The assessee, an SPV executing the Hyderabad–Yadgiri highway project under NHAI, filed return declaring a loss of ₹37.84 crore. PCIT invoked section 263, finding that the AO w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930