Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samir Kumar Paikaray Vs ITO ( ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Samir Kumar Paikaray Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Remands Cash Credit Case: Opportunity Must Be Given to Legal Heir for Evidence; Demonetisation Tax Dispute: Assessment Remanded Due to Assessee’s Death; Legal Heir Gets a Fresh Chance” – ITAT Cuttack Remands Demonetisation Cash Case for Re-Examination The late assessee, proprietor of Paikaray Filling Station, had deposited ₹2.90 crore in cash during demonetisation, claiming the source as petrol-pump sales & recovery from debtors. AO disbelieved the explanation, treated ₹57.24 lakh as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, added ₹5....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930