Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Johnson & Johnson Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Johnson & Johnson Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that no provision in the Income Tax Act mandated inclusion of trademark, acquired prior to 01/04/1998, in the block of assets thus there was no depreciation allowable on the same. Hence, provisions of section 50 has no applicability and transfer of such trademark is treatable as long-term capital gain. Facts- During the assessment proceedings, it was observed that the assessee sold two trademarks “Coldarin” and “Raricap”. The gains accrued on the transfer of both these capital assets gave rise to income charge...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930