Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pattaveettil Parameswar Ramachandran Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pattaveettil Parameswar Ramachandran Vs ITO (Kerala High Court) Conclusion: Reopening of notice under section 148A(b) was valid as assessee was served notices both physically and via email and assessee had been granted sufficient opportunity to respond to the notice however, assessee failed to avail the opportunity granted. Thus, there was no violation of the principles of natural justice and notice was valid. Held: Assessee had sold an immovable property during the year financial year 2015-16 but he failed to file a return for the assessment year 2016-17. Alleging that income chargeable to ta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031