Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sachin Ramesh Pawar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sachin Ramesh Pawar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Conclusion: Since assessee’s claims regarding possession and consideration were supported by documents that were not presented before AO or CIT(A), Tribunal directed AO to verify the facts by deputing an inspector or obtaining a remand report from the ITO, Satara. If it was confirmed that possession remained with assessee and no consideration was received, LTCG addition would be invalid. Held: Assessee was running a computer center. Assessee and seven co-owners entered a Development Agreement with Shri Nath Builders Promoters P. Ltd to receive a built-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031