This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SEZ Developer Entitled to Service Tax Refund for Authorised Operations Under Section 26: CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
The appeal challenged an order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Mumbai Zone I, which upheld rejection of the appellant’s claim for refund of service tax paid on banking and other financial services provided by NSDL. The appellant, a developer that had established a unit in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) at Jamnagar, sought refund of Rs. 12,32,233 under Section 26 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, contending that, as an SEZ developer, it was not liable to bear service tax on services received f...
Author Info
