Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Sai Max Jewelers (CESTAT Allahabad)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 70221 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/02/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Sai Max Jewelers (CESTAT Allahabad)

The case of “Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Sai Max Jewelers” (CESTAT Allahabad) centers on the seizure of six gold bars weighing approximately 5999.820 grams, valued at Rs. 1,83,59,448, which were intercepted by the Government Railway Police (GRP) and subsequently handed over to Customs authorities. The key legal question is whether the seized gold bars are of foreign origin and were smuggled into India.

Background and Initial Seizure

On July 23, 2018, at Mughal Sarai railway station, the GRP intercepted Shiv Raj Singh, who was found in possession of six gold bars. Singh failed to produce any documents at the time of seizure, which led the GRP to suspect that the gold bars were smuggled. The gold was handed over to the Customs for further investigation on July 24, 2018. Despite Singh’s claim that he had proper returnable invoices and bills of supply, these were not considered by the authorities.

Customs Investigation and Adjudication

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031