This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Taxpayer Fails to Prove CA’s Advice: ITAT Denies Appeal Delay Condonation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Raveendra M. Madrak Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Raveendra M. Madrak Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
The case of Raveendra M. Madrak vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore) revolves around the condonation of a 310-day delay in filing an appeal. Despite the taxpayer’s claim of reliance on professional advice, the ITAT ruled against condoning the delay. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case and its implications.
The taxpayer sought condonation of a 310-day delay in filing an appeal, citing advice from their Chartered Accountant (CA) to engage an Advocate for the appeal. However, the delay was attributed to the Advocate’s failure to file...
