This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Extended Limitation in Service Tax Demand -Unjust if no Proof of Fraud or Evasion
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Thakarshi J Likhiya Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Thakarshi J Likhiya Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Introduction: In a noteworthy ruling, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Ahmedabad, in the case of Thakarshi J Likhiya Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, focused on the legality of service tax demand for an extended period of limitation without adequate evidence of fraud, collusion, misstatement, suppression, or intention to evade tax.
Analysis: The tribunal addressed two fundamental questions: Whether the appellant, as a subcontractor, was liable to pay serv...





