Case Law Details
Vodafone Mauritius Limited Vs ACIT Circle International Tax (Delhi High Court)
Introduction: In an intriguing legal face-off, Vodafone Mauritius Limited has found itself at odds with the ACIT Circle International Tax. The crux of this case lies in the validity of the Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) issued to Vodafone Mauritius. The Delhi High Court has taken upon itself the task of mediating this complex tax dispute, and its recent judgment has been eagerly awaited by legal and tax experts alike.
Analysis: In its evaluation, the Delhi High Court carefully considered the specifics of the dispute. Vodafone Mauritius contended that, having been issued a TRC under Mauritius law, it is entitled to the benefits of Article 13 of the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The assessing officer (AO), however, contested that a TRC is not absolute proof of an entity’s residential status.
Furthermore, the AO suggested potential malpractices such as treaty shopping, attributing a potentially unlawful intent to Vodafone Mauritius. However, the court found no solid evidence to substantiate these claims. The AO’s tentative observations were deemed insufficient to establish the invalidity of the TRC.
The court emphasized that unless there is concrete information implying that the TRC held by Vodafone Mauritius is not legally valid, the AO’s order cannot be maintained. Thus, the court concluded that the most appropriate course of action is to direct the AO to provide the petitioner with any material or information that might lead to the rejection of the TRC.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
