Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs Chander Prakash Pabreja (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 383/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Issue before court:
Whether ITAT was correct in upholding the order of CIT (A),who deleted addition made u/s 68 as undisclosed income, relying upon the assessment orders of another year and ignored the facts that assessee himself declared receipt of certain amount.
Brief facts of the case:
- The assessee during the relevant AY 2005-06 claimed benefit of Section 44AF of Income Tax Act and filed a return disclosing income of Rs. 2,15,292/-.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.