Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Chander Prakash Pabreja (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 383/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Issue before court:

Whether ITAT was correct in upholding the order of CIT (A),who deleted addition made u/s 68 as undisclosed income, relying upon the assessment orders of another year and ignored the facts that assessee himself declared receipt of certain amount.

Brief facts of the case:

  • The assessee during the relevant AY 2005-06 claimed benefit of Section 44AF of Income Tax Act and filed a return disclosing income of Rs. 2,15,292/-.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031