Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Chander Prakash Pabreja (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Issue before court: Whether ITAT was correct in upholding the order of CIT (A),who deleted addition made u/s 68 as undisclosed income, relying upon the assessment orders of another year and ignored the facts that assessee himself declared receipt of certain amount. Brief facts of the case: The assessee during the relevant AY 2005-06 claimed benefit of Section 44AF of Income Tax Act and filed a return disclosing income of Rs. 2,15,292/-. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened under Section 147 of the Act. AO. The AO considered the source of a separate cash deposit of Rs. 31,29,880/- and fur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930