Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Manoj Bansal, CIT Vs Radhey Sham Bansal, CIT Vs Suresh Kumar Gupta (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : I .T.A. No. 578/2008, 582/2008, 583/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/01/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Facts of the case-

♠ The subject appeals are filed on similar grounds and accordingly have been discharged by a single order.

♠ The present appeal has been received on limited remit by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which had by its judgment reported as CIT V. Calcutta Knitwear (2014) 362 ITR 673 (SC) directed examination of the limited question as to whether opinion formation, in terms of Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act, and the time within which it had to be recorded was complied with.

♠ A search was conducted on 3.8.2000 in the premises of Sh. Manoj Aggarwal. This led to the seizure of various documents and other materials; even the statement was recorded under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act.

♠ The present assessees were issued with a notice on 22.03.2004 by his assessing officer. It was alleged by the revenue that the notice was on account of opinion formation in terms of Section 158BB of Sh. Manoj Aggarwal’s assessing officer.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031