This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Valid “Satisfaction Note” as required u/s 158BD requires proper recording of evidences for being satisfied
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Manoj Bansal, CIT Vs Radhey Sham Bansal, CIT Vs Suresh Kumar Gupta (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Brief Facts of the case-
♠ The subject appeals are filed on similar grounds and accordingly have been discharged by a single order.
♠ The present appeal has been received on limited remit by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which had by its judgment reported as CIT V. Calcutta Knitwear (2014) 362 ITR 673 (SC) directed examination of the limited question as to whether opinion formation, in terms of Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act, and the time within which it had to be recorded was complied with.
♠ A search was conducted on 3.8.2000 in the premises of Sh. Manoj Aggarwal. ...
