Case Law Details
Brief Facts of the Case
The appellant deals in the manufacture and sale of cement. According to the appellant, in the present case, sale of cement was made at the destination of the buyer and hence the appellant would be entitled to CENVAT credit on input service on transportation of the cement sold by the appellant.
Initially, the period in dispute was from August 2006 to October2007 and from November 2007 to July 2008.
In view of the change in definition of input service provided in Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 w.e.f. 1.4.2008 although the assessing authority as well as the first appellate authority had denied the benefit to the appellant for the entire period but the Tribunal granted the benefit of CENVAT credit to the appellant for the period upto 31.03.2008 but has denied the same from 01.04.2008 to 31.07.2008, which is the relevant period in question in this appeal.
Held by Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
