Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Abhideep Chemicals Vs PR CIT-14 (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.797/Mum/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/05/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

assessee company has sold the property and shown sale consideration at Rs.30 lakh whereas the stamp duty value of the property Rs.1,42,83,000/- and accordingly the Assessee arrived at loss of Rs.44,87,519/- on sale of the residential property. While passing the order u/s.143(3), the AO has not uttered a single word with regard to applicability of provisions of Section 50C in respect of building sold by assessee to its Managing Director. The provisions of the Section 50C are applicable in the case of transfer of land and building including depreciable capital asset. The provision of section 50C contains a special provision for determining full value of consideration and as per provisions of section 50C when the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer by an Assessee of capital asset being land or building or both, is less than the value adopted or assessed by an authority of the State Government for the payment of stamp duty in respect of such transfer, the value so adopted or assessed shall for the purpose of Section 48, be the full value of consideration received or accruing as a result of such transfer. In the instant case, the property has been transferred to Mrs. Alka B Birewar, the Managing director of the assessee company for Rs. 30 lakhs against the stamp duty valuation of the property of Rs.1 ,42,83,000/ -. The Hon’ble Bombay High court in the case of Bhatia Nagar Premises Co-Operative society Ltd. had an occasion to consider the scope of on 50 C and it is held by their Lordships that Section 50C is a measure provided to bridge the gap as it was found that the assessee were not correctly declaring the full value of consideration or in other words resorting to the practice of under valuation. Further, the decision of Special Bench in the case of ITO vs. United Marines Academy (supra) has made it clear that section 50C will be applicable on the sale value of depreciable asset.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT

The present appeal is filed against Pr. CIT’s order dated 27th January, 2016 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), revising assessment order dated 13th March, 2014 passed by the AO.

2. Ground Nos. 1 to 5 are against the Pr. CIT’s View that section 50 C of the Act applies to the depreciable assets. Ground Nos. 6 and 7 are against the Pr. CIT’s action of not dealing with the Assessee’s submissions that it is eligible for exemption under section 54 EC of the Act in respect of short term capital gains made under section 50 where the assets were held for more than three years.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031