Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mr. Lemes E. D’ Souza, ALK Bricks Factory Company, Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 5802/Mum/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/04/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Section 54EC of 1961 Act is a beneficial provision and is to be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intention of Parliament while legislating the said provision and it cannot be construed in manner to frustrate the intention of legislature . In this case, the assessee admittedly received payments after execution of the agreement on 06-08-2008, which were received over a period of time from 07-08-2008 to 15-11-2008 and investments of Rs. 43,51,000/- were made in NHAI/REC Bonds on 26-03-2009 which is within six months if reckoned from the date of receipt of last instalment of sale consideration by the assessee on 15-11- 2008 and also is within six months from the receipt of second instalment of Rs. 35,00,000/- on 26-09-2008. It is also admitted and undisputed that first instalment of Rs. 19,92,750/- received by the assessee on 07-08-2008 was utilised by assessee for paying architect fee and payment of share of his brother in TDR. Considering the factual matrix of the case as discussed above, we are of the considered view that the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 54EC of the Act and addition of Rs. 24,85,420/- made by the AO and as confirmed by learned CIT(A) is not sustainable in eyes of law and is hereby ordered to be deleted.

O R D E R

PER RAMIT KOCHAR, Accountant Member

This appeal, filed by the assessee, being ITA No. 5802/Mum/2013 is directed against the appellate order dated 15th July, 2013 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 22, Mumbai (hereinafter called “the CIT(A)”), for the assessment year 2009-10, the appellate proceedings before the learned CIT(A) arising from the assessment order dated 26th December, 2011 passed by the learned Assessing Officer (hereinafter called “the AO”) u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (Hereinafter called “the Act”).

2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in memo of appeal filed with the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter called “the tribunal”) read as under:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Hiren nahar says:

    I have sold my flat on Aug 8 2017 but no I can invest in rec a and nhi bonds because it is been 6months or where should I put money in capital gain tax account what is the time period of depositing

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031