Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Churu Trading Co. (P) Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 1999- 2000 & 2004- 05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Unless there is a finding that assessee’s investment is not business activity and the funds are not utilized for the purpose of business, dis allowance under section 36(1)(iii) does not arise. There is no dis allowance under section 14A in this year as the dividend income was taxable. Therefore, the interest dis allowance has to be considered under section 36(1)(iii). If there is income or loss under the head “capital gains”, the interest dis allowance under section 36(1)(iii) pertaining to the investment activity is also to be considered as deduction, while working out the capital gain....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930