Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Churu Trading Co. (P) Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 1999- 2000 & 2004- 05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Unless there is a finding that assessee’s investment is not business activity and the funds are not utilized for the purpose of business, dis allowance under section 36(1)(iii) does not arise. There is no dis allowance under section 14A in this year as the dividend income was taxable. Therefore, the interest dis allowance has to be considered under section 36(1)(iii). If there is income or loss under the head “capital gains”, the interest dis allowance under section 36(1)(iii) pertaining to the investment activity is also to be considered as deduction, whi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31