Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamdar Kiritkumar Chandulal HUF Vs PCIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamdar Kiritkumar Chandulal HUF Vs PCIT (ITAT Rajkot) The ITAT Rajkot allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2020-21. The dispute related to the assessee’s claim of agricultural income of ₹41.63 lakh, which had been accepted by the Assessing Officer during scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Act. The assessee had filed its return declaring nil taxable income and agricultural income of ₹41,63,806. The case was selected...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031