Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nachimuthu Sivashanmugam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nachimuthu Sivashanmugam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The assessee, an individual engaged in the business of running goods carriages, had not filed his return for AY 2017-18. The AO initiated reassessment proceedings and initially made an addition of ₹4.10 crore u/s 68. Subsequently, in revision proceedings u/s 264, the PCIT set aside the assessment and directed the AO to pass a fresh order. In the fresh assessment, the AO treated cash deposits of ₹61.31 lakh as unexplained money u/s 69A. On appeal, the CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee’s claim and reduced the addition to ₹30.43 lakh, but ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Grants Full TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax ITAT Deletes Bogus LTCG Addition on Green Crest Shares; Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty on Estimated Income and Defective Show-Cause Notice Bangalore ITAT: TDS Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely Because It Was Omitted in Original Return Assessment on Amalgamated Bank’s Predecessor Held Void; ITAT Quashes Order Passed in Name of Non-Existent Syndicate Bank View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930