Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nachimuthu Sivashanmugam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nachimuthu Sivashanmugam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The assessee, an individual engaged in the business of running goods carriages, had not filed his return for AY 2017-18. The AO initiated reassessment proceedings and initially made an addition of ₹4.10 crore u/s 68. Subsequently, in revision proceedings u/s 264, the PCIT set aside the assessment and directed the AO to pass a fresh order. In the fresh assessment, the AO treated cash deposits of ₹61.31 lakh as unexplained money u/s 69A. On appeal, the CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee’s claim and reduced the addition to ₹30.43 lakh, but ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Year-End Provisions Trigger TDS – ITAT Upholds Default but Grants Relief Window Souharda Society Wins 80P Deduction – ITAT Rejects Technical Denial & Expands Benefit Interest Paid = Deductible When Obligation Exists – ITAT Allows Claim on Capital Bond Arrangement Delay Excused, Ex-Parte Order Set Aside – ITAT Gives Fresh Hearing with Token Cost No Proof, No Exemption – ITAT Remands “Agricultural Income” Claim with Cost View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031