Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Return Filing Mistake Can Be Rectified If U/s 143(1) Intimation Not Served: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 1669
Case Name
Krishnaping Alloys Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2006-07
Advertisement

Krishnaping Alloys Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Rectification for Return-Filing Mistake Revived; Mere Dispatch Entry Not Proof of 143(1) Service

The assessee’s return for AY 2006-07 correctly showed profit before tax of about ₹22 lakh, but due to an accountant’s error the gross sales figure of about ₹5.05 crore was mistakenly entered in the “income from business” column in the computation, inflating the total income to about ₹5.08 crore. The return was processed under section 143(1) on the basis of this erroneous figure, creating a huge demand of about ₹2 crore.

The assessee claimed that it never received the 143(1) intimation and therefore remained unaware of this demand for years. Even subsequent recovery notices issued in 2013 and 2016 did not mention any demand for this assessment year. The issue surfaced only when the assessee later checked the tax portal and then filed a rectification application under section 154 to correct the apparent mistake. The AO rejected the rectification and the CIT(A) confirmed the rejection.

The Tribunal noted two key aspects:

1. The error was apparent from the return record itself, since the profit and loss figures and schedules showed the correct profit while only the computation column carried the wrong figure.

2. The Revenue relied merely on a dispatch register entry to claim service of the 143(1) intimation. Following the Orissa High Court decision in Alok Kumar Mahapatra, the Tribunal held that a dispatch entry alone is not conclusive proof of actual service so as to deny rectification on limitation grounds.

Since the AO had rejected the rectification without examining on merits whether there was a “mistake apparent from record”, the Tribunal set aside both the AO and CIT(A) orders. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication of the section 154 application after verifying the return, computation and records and after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes with a direction for de novo consideration of the rectification claim.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,911

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.