Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Atchutha Venkata Sreenivasa Rao Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Atchutha Venkata Sreenivasa Rao Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Unsigned Seized Agreement Cannot Prove Cash Receipt: Addition Under Section 69A Deleted The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹1,83,600 made under section 69A, holding that an unsigned and unacted-upon seized document cannot, by itself, establish receipt of unexplained cash. The addition was based on an alleged “agreement of sale” found during a search in the case of the Spectra Group, from which the Assessing Officer inferred a proportionate cash receipt by the assessee. The Tribun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031