Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs R. Dhinagharan (HUF) (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs R. Dhinagharan (HUF) (ITAT Chennai) The appeal before the ITAT Chennai arose from deletion of penalty levied under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 2016–17. The Joint Commissioner had imposed a penalty of ₹3,03,46,301 for alleged violation of section 269SS, on the ground that the assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family engaged in real estate development, received the entire sale consideration for sale of plots in cash at the time of registration of sale deeds. The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted the penalty, holding that the transactions were fully disclosed, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031