Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hareshkumar Mafatlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hareshkumar Mafatlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee had declared LTCG of ₹2,41,53,979 from sale of shares of Sunrise Asian Ltd (SAL) & Monarch Health Services Ltd (MHSL), acquired through proper banking channels, held in Demat, & sold on BSE with STT paid. AO treated entire gain as bogus penny-stock accommodation entry based on general investigation statements of one Vipul Bhatt & denied cross-examination. AO added LTCG u/s 68 & alleged commission of ₹9,66,159 u/s 69C. NFAC upheld additions. Before Tribunal, Assessee relied on multiple binding precedents: Gujarat HC â...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031