2002 Haryana Remission Policy Governs; Contrary Earlier Ruling Per Incuriam: SC

Parveen Kumar @ Parveen Chauhan Vs State of Haryana & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) Supreme Court Explains the Doctrine of Per Incuriam; Holds Earlier Remission Ruling Not Binding In a significant judgment on judicial precedents, the Supreme Court has elaborately explained the doctrine of per incuriam and held that its earlier decision in State of Haryana v. Raj Kumar (2021) was rendered per incuriam as it overlooked the binding ratio of the larger Bench decision in State of Haryana v. Jagdish (2010). Consequently, the Court held that the Haryana Remission Policy, 2002, issued under Articl...