Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)

153C assessment quashed for want of year-wise satisfaction; protective addition of ₹14.91 Cr u/s 69 deleted as no substantive addition existed in companies’ hands

In this appeal by the Revenue & the Cross-Objection filed by Assessee, the Tribunal examined the legality of a protective addition of ₹14.91 Crores made u/s 69 towards alleged unexplained investments in Vasan Construction Company Pvt Ltd & DS Builders Pvt Ltd based solely on loose she

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Revision u/s 263 Quashed: AO’s Plausible View on 80P Deduction Cannot Be Substituted by PCIT-Bang Trib Section 153C Additions Fail Without Corroboration and Cross-Examination Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031