Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)

153C assessment quashed for want of year-wise satisfaction; protective addition of ₹14.91 Cr u/s 69 deleted as no substantive addition existed in companies’ hands

In this appeal by the Revenue & the Cross-Objection filed by Assessee, the Tribunal examined the legality of a protective addition of ₹14.91 Crores made u/s 69 towards alleged unexplained investments in Vasan Construction Company Pvt Ltd & DS Builders Pvt Ltd based solely on loose she

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031