Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai) 153C assessment quashed for want of year-wise satisfaction; protective addition of ₹14.91 Cr u/s 69 deleted as no substantive addition existed in companies’ hands In this appeal by the Revenue & the Cross-Objection filed by Assessee, the Tribunal examined the legality of a protective addition of ₹14.91 Crores made u/s 69 towards alleged unexplained investments in Vasan Construction Company Pvt Ltd & DS Builders Pvt Ltd based solely on loose sheets seized during search on the Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Group. The Assessee, a former employee a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031