Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Ramasamy Rajasehar (ITAT Chennai)

153C assessment quashed for want of year-wise satisfaction; protective addition of ₹14.91 Cr u/s 69 deleted as no substantive addition existed in companies’ hands

In this appeal by the Revenue & the Cross-Objection filed by Assessee, the Tribunal examined the legality of a protective addition of ₹14.91 Crores made u/s 69 towards alleged unexplained investments in Vasan Construction Company Pvt Ltd & DS Builders Pvt Ltd based solely on loose she

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Under Section 147/144 Struck Down for Not Issuing Section 143(2) Despite Valid Return Survey-Based 8% Estimation Cut to 4%: ITAT Ensures Parity With Parents’ Cases Temple Vazhipadu vs Demonetisation: ITAT Deletes SBN Addition of Rs. 1.45 Lakh Vivad se Vishwas Opt-Out Does Not Bar Tax Appeal: ITAT Decision Section 96 Overrides Income Tax for Post-2014 Land Acquisitions View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031