ROC Bangalore penalised Amagi Media Labs Ltd. and its directors for a 49-day delay in appointing a company secretary, violating Section 203(5) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Learn how GST classification works for goods and services, its importance, key schedules, HSN codes, and interpretative rules guiding correct tax rate determination.
ROC Bangalore imposed penalties on Amagi Media Labs and its directors for delay in appointing a company secretary under Section 203 of the Companies Act.
Karnataka High Court held that issuance of reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act after expiry of statutory period of limitation as prescribed under section 149 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, petition allowed.
The ITAT Chennai allowed a charitable trust to rectify its mistake of applying for provisional 80G registration, remanding the case for reconsideration under the correct clause for a five-year registration.
Considering the duration of custody, the High Court directed the release of the petitioner on bail despite being identified as the mastermind of the GST evasion.
The Supreme Court considered an inquiry report finding a UP police officer prima facie guilty of wilfully defying the court’s protective order against coercive measures.
The Delhi High Court set aside the second Section 148 notice, ruling it was time-barred and constituted an illegal initiation of parallel reassessment proceedings.
Calcutta High Court directs CGST authorities to accept a delayed appeal against a Section 73 order and re-examine a pending SCN after restoring the petitioner’s GST portal access.
CESTAT Mumbai set aside a ₹1 lakh penalty on a Custom House Agent (CHA), ruling that mere classification disputes are not grounds for confiscation or penalty.
