Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Erroneous Classification Not Ground for Section 112(a) Penalty: CESTAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kwick Cargo Tracers & Lifters Vs Commissioner of Customs (NS-III) (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Kwick Cargo Tracers & Lifters Vs Commissioner of Customs (NS-III) (CESTAT Mumbai) The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, delivered an order in the appeal filed by Kwick Cargo Tracers & Lifters, a Custom House Agent (CHA) and a co-noticee, challenging a penalty of ₹1 lakh imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The penalty was levied by the Commissioner of Customs, NS-III, JNCH, Nhava Sheva, via an Order-in-Original dated January 6, 2017. The main noticee in the original proceedings was M/s. Sirthai Superware India Ltd....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,797

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *